Connect with us

Energy & Critical Metals

Is Now the Time to Take Advantage of the FuelCell Stock Price?

FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) saw its shares close at a high of $27.96 in early February. Since then, the story has been much less impressive, with the…

Share this article:

Published

on

This article was originally published by Investor Place

FuelCell Energy (NASDAQ:FCEL) saw its shares close at a high of $27.96 in early February. Since then, the story has been much less impressive, with the stock in a long slide. At this point, FCEL stock is trading for $6.71, down 76% from its February high. Shares are also down 40% for the year. So, not quite what investors envisioned when they bought into this fuel cell power plant company. However, over the past few weeks there have been some positive signs, including a big pop on September 14 based on an encouraging earnings report.

Source: Kaca Skokanova/Shutterstock

When it was going for nearly $28, the long-term growth prospects for FCEL stock were a little dim. Any big benefits from the government’s green energy and infrastructure initiatives were probably built-into that price. In addition, the company was having trouble showing revenue growth, let alone progress toward profitability. However, given its current price and FuelCell’s latest quarterly earnings results, is now the time to make a move on FCEL stock?

FuelCell’s Green Energy Cred

The key element of the FuelCell Energy story is its position as a clean energy source. The company builds micro-scale power plants that run using fuel cell technology. They are currently in use at locations such as hospitals and manufacturing sites.

Last October, FuelCell was awarded $8 million in funding by the U.S. Department of Energy to develop a SureSource fuel cell plant to produce hydrogen for fuel. In April, FuelCell announced that its SureSource fuel cell power plants had generated 12 million MWH of electricity since their first commercial installation. Its technology was credited with avoiding over 1.5 million tons of CO2 emissions.

Thus, the company’s green energy credibility and the government’s priority of spending big to achieve a net zero-emissions economy is what helped power FCEL stock to such lofty heights in February.

Third-Quarter Earnings Show Big Improvements

One of the biggest concerns about FuelCell has been its ability to grow its business and ultimately move toward profitability.

In the first quarter, the company reported revenue of $14.9 million — down from $16.3 million the year before. That was a big miss, with the market expecting to see revenue in the $22 million range. Its loss of 15 cents per share was also a big miss. In addition, the company was burning through cash. InvestorPlace contributor Mark R. Hake pegged the total cash burn for Q1 at $34.89 million. In Q2, revenue dropped again. And through this, FCEL stock was losing ground.

On Sept. 14, FuelCell reported its Q3 earnings. And for a change, there was a glimmer of hope for investors. Revenue was up 43% year-over-year, at $26.8 million. Adjusted losses per share were 4 cents. Both numbers handily beat Wall Street estimates. FCEL stock closed up nearly 15% on the news.

This was only one quarter, but it raises the possibility that FuelCell has turned a corner.

Bottom Line on FCEL Stock

Overall, FuelCell can be a divisive stock among investors. The company clearly has potential, and as a part of the renewable energy club, shares saw impressive growth to start the year. However, its lack of meaningful revenue growth combined with a high cash burn rate has raised concern. Worried that the company may never achieve profitability, many investors cashed out. That’s why we saw FCEL stock drop 74% in three months in the spring.

At this point, I feel the positives about FuelCell are beginning to outweigh the negatives, especially for investors who think long-term. The company’s Q3 earnings were a big improvement and beat market expectations. The government’s infrastructure bill has been delayed yet again, but is expected to be passed by the end of the month. That is going to boost spending on “green” energy projects — an obvious plus for FuelCell.

The bears are currently in the majority for FCEL stock, still hung up on the issues mentioned. The investment analysts polled by the Wall Street Journal have FCEL rated as “underweight” with an average $6.89 price target. Currently trading at $6.71, FCEL stock remains up 156% over the past 12 months. So there’s definitely room to slide further. In fact, one of the WSJ analysts has a $3 price target.

On the other hand, there are those recent positives for FuelCell, plus its “A” rating in Portfolio Grader. With the push toward green energy gaining momentum and its current price, the long-term growth potential for FCEL stock is very real.

On the date of publication, neither Louis Navellier nor the InvestorPlace Research Staff member primarily responsible for this article held (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com Publishing Guidelines.

Louis Navellier, who has been called “one of the most important money managers of our time,” has broken the silence in this shocking “tell all” video… exposing one of the most shocking events in our country’s history… and the one move every American needs to make today.

More From InvestorPlace

The post Is Now the Time to Take Advantage of the FuelCell Stock Price? appeared first on InvestorPlace.

Energy & Critical Metals

Octopus Energy to build co-located green hydrogen projects in UK

UK utility Octopus Energy is set to develop green hydrogen projects alongside the company’s 4 GW of renewable energy capacity in the UK.
The post Octopus…

Share this article:

A new deal signed by Octopus Energy will enable the utility to develop green hydrogen projects alongside the company’s 4GW of renewable energy capacity in the UK.

Octopus Energy has partnered with Innova Renewables and Novus to design, implement and operate green hydrogen projects.

The utility’s arm Octopus Hydrogen will design and install electrolysers, compression and mobile hydrogen storage projects for Novus. The electrolysers will be between 2 and 20MW in scale and will be installed at Octopus Energy’s existing and new solar, wind and energy storage projects.

These combined renewable energy and hydrogen sites will be among the first co-located green hydrogen projects in the UK, helping to establish a green hydrogen market and the model for a decentralised production and distribution business.

The green hydrogen production facilities will be directly connected to on-site renewable energy generation which will be purchased via long-term power purchase agreements, producing between 500 and 2500kg of hydrogen per day.

Have you read?
Hydrogen valleys critical to achieving greener EU economy
Macron commits to SMR reactors and green hydrogen by 2030

Octopus Energy will provide software for optimal control of the electrolysers. The software will provide the utility with insights regarding the best times to divert renewable energy used to balance the grid for the production of green hydrogen, according to a statement. This will help reduce renewable energy curtailment.

Octopus Hydrogen will be combining the full value chain from production, optimisation and delivery to end-users in the transport sector. The projects will enable the three parties to play a key role in energy transition and help the UK move closer to its 2050 net-zero goal.

Will Rowe, Founder and CEO of Octopus Hydrogen, said: “This is an incredibly exciting step forward on the journey for Octopus Hydrogen. Partnering with Innova and Novus will allow us to develop and establish our decentralised model for green hydrogen production in the UK.

“Through this partnership, we will increase the amount of green hydrogen available in the UK by approximately 25 tonnes per day, enough to decarbonise over 500 long haul HGV’s.

“We need to see electrification wherever possible, for home heating and domestic cars, but we also need green hydrogen to help decarbonise the hard-to-abate parts of the transport sector.”

We can’t wait to see you in Milan

Enlit Europe will bring the energy community together during the live event in Milan (30 November – 2 December 2021). Register here

The post Octopus Energy to build co-located green hydrogen projects in UK appeared first on Power Engineering International.

Continue Reading

Articles

Japan’s New Prime Minister Admits Abenomics Was A Failure

Japan’s New Prime Minister Admits Abenomics Was A Failure

Sometimes it takes years, if not decades to be proven right in a world that has…

Share this article:

Japan's New Prime Minister Admits Abenomics Was A Failure

Sometimes it takes years, if not decades to be proven right in a world that has been turned upside down.

Take Abenomics, the "radical" Japanese vision that was supposed to overhaul Japan's economy and society, push wages higher, boost Japanese exports, spark en economic renaissance and drag Japan out of its perpetual deflationary debt trap (but it's not targeting a weaker yen, it was never targeting a weaker yen) yet was nothing more than sanctioned money printing, and which we bashed from the very beginning, to wit:

... and so much more, it was just today, almost a decade after Abenomics first arrived on the scene, that we get the official verdict, that it was - as we said all along - a failure.

Speaking to the FT in his first interview with international media since taking over Japan’s leadership this month, Fumio Kishida, Japan's new prime minister pledged to move the country away from neoliberalism as he lambasted his own party’s failure to deliver broad-based growth under the Abenomics programme that defined the economy for almost a decade.

Kishida told the FT that while regulatory reform remained necessary, he would approach it with a focus on narrowing the gap between the rich and poor. The implication - Abenomics, like money printing everywhere else, was responsible for creating a staggering chasm between the rich and poor.

“Abenomics clearly delivered results in terms of gross domestic product, corporate earnings and employment. But it failed to reach the point of creating a ‘virtuous cycle’,” Kishida said, in his bluntest attack on a program embraced by his two predecessors that propelled the Tokyo stock market through a doubling in value.

“I want to achieve a virtuous economic cycle by raising the incomes of not just a certain segment, but a broader range of people to trigger consumption. I believe that’s the key to how the new form of capitalism is going to be different from the past,” he added, Kishida said sounding almost socialist.

In Japan, “neoliberalism” most often refers to the reforms of the 1990s and 2000s, including deregulation, privatization and labor market reform, rather than tight fiscal policy and cuts to public spending. By openly criticising his predecessor, Shinzo Abe, who failed not once but twice as Japan’s longest-serving prime minister and who resigned in September 2020, Kishida took a calculated risk according to the FT, as he prepares for a general election on October 31.

One reason for his assault on Abenomics is that recent polls have showed him with an average approval rating of just over 50 per cent, considerably lower than most of his predecessors when they came into office and a signal, said political analysts, that his honeymoon period for enacting meaningful reform may be short.

The former foreign minister was chosen to replace Yoshihide Suga as leader of the ruling Liberal Democratic party on the understanding that he would offer “status quo” stability and continuity. Despite attempts to remove that image, he has already backtracked on one of his major policy initiatives to raise capital gains tax after share prices fell sharply on concerns that such a move would kill a recent revival of interest by individual domestic investors.

Kishida stressed his new economic approach — involving tax incentives for companies to raise wages and pay increases for nurses and care workers — would attempt to reverse the failures of the “trickle-down” theories and market-led reforms that have guided Japanese policymaking from the mid-2000s.

“Everyone just considers regulatory reform in terms of market fundamentalism, competition and survival of the fittest. That’s the problem with our past thinking on regulatory reform,” Kishida said, calling on companies and the public to share a more holistic vision of the economy.

He also envisions deeper collaboration between the state and the private sector to secure strategic assets and technologies such as chips and rare earths that will be pivotal for economic security.

“It is important to ensure a self-sufficient economy when we are considering future growth,” Kishida said. “We need to make sure that Japan has technologies that are critical to complete global supply chains so we can achieve indispensability.”

Kishida publicly signaled for the first time that he may also take a new approach to the corporate governance reform that has been a pillar of the Abenomics programme alongside aggressive monetary easing and fiscal stimulus.While Japan introduced its first corporate governance code in 2015, Kishida said a separate code may be needed to address the needs of small and medium-sized companies. “It’s not realistic to apply the same rules. Corporate governance is important for small- and medium-sized enterprises but they can’t do it in the same way as big companies,” he explained.

Predictably, corporate executives who got egregiously rich thanks to money printing Abenomics have privately expressed scepticism about the new prime minister’s economic agenda, pointing to how Japan has failed to emerge from deflation and open up rigidly regulated markets even after nearly nine years of strong public support for Abenomics. Their solution: do more of what has failed, after all it makes them richer.

Kishida also faces a more complex geopolitical environment than his predecessors, with China’s increasing assertiveness and a global rush to secure national supply chains following the turmoil caused by the coronavirus pandemic.When asked about the new trilateral security partnership the US has launched with the UK and Australia to strengthen their ability to counter China, Kishida said Japan had no specific plans to join the framework.

But he added: “Considering the stability of the region, it is extremely important for European and US countries to be interested and involved in Asia’s security environment.”

Kishida heads an LDP faction with a historically dovish stance on China, but as prime minister, he has called for a strengthening of the country’s missile and other defense capabilities.

For the upcoming election, the ruling party for the first time included a manifesto pledge to double defence spending, in a break from the long-held tradition to keep its military budget within 1 per cent of GDP.

“On the economic front, it’s important to stabilize relations with China,” Kishida said, before noting recent “questionable behavior” from Beijing. “So on the political level, Japan must be able to firmly assert itself against China.”

Tyler Durden Fri, 10/15/2021 - 20:50
Continue Reading

Energy & Critical Metals

QuantumScape is Still a Long Way From Showtime

QuantumScape (NASDAQ:QS) has had a difficult 2021. After topping out just below $133 per share in December, QS stock has lost more than 80% of its value….

Share this article:

QuantumScape (NASDAQ:QS) has had a difficult 2021. After topping out just below $133 per share in December, QS stock has lost more than 80% of its value. It’s been tripped up by a number of things recently, including insider stock sales, a devastating short-seller report and a washout within the special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) arena.

Source: Tada Images / Shutterstock.com

At the heart of the matter is a simple question: Does QuantumScape’s battery technology work and offer the benefits that it purports to?

The 188-page report from Scorpion Capital earlier this year made some compelling arguments against QuantumScape’s credibility. And the company hasn’t managed to rebut much of the negative perception Scorpion created.

Rather, management continues going along with their timeline. Perhaps as the company nears commercial battery production the market will start to give QuantumScape more credit. However, a recent development casts some doubt on that theory.

Dissecting QuantumScape’s Recent Partnership

QS stock popped from around $20 to close to $29 in late September on elevated trading volume. After a difficult summer, it looked like QuantumScape might finally be charging up. However, a closer investigation of the recent move showed it didn’t hold much merit.

It started on Sept. 21, when QuantumScape announced that it had signed a partnership. QuantumScape described it as “an agreement with a second top ten (by global revenues) automotive original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) in which the OEM committed to collaborate with the Company to evaluate prototypes of the Company’s solid-state battery cells, and to purchase 10 MWh of capacity from the Company’s pre-pilot production line facility (“QS-0”) for inclusion in pre-series vehicles, subject to satisfactory validation of intermediate milestones.”

At first glance, this seems great. A top 10 OEM wants to use QuantumScape batteries. That should add a lot of revenue, right? Not so fast.

For one, we don’t know who the OEM is. Think back to QuantumScape’s first OEM partnership. Recall how Volkswagen (OTCMKTS:VWAGY) — according to the Scorpion report — was disappointed with QuantumScape’s work and transparency. It’s understandable why another OEM might not be in a rush to associate its name publicly with QuantumScape.

Furthermore, the 10 MWh purchase agreement, you’ll note, is subject to validation of intermediate milestones. These, according to the company, are expected to be satisfied sometime before it begins production in 2023. That’s potentially still quite a ways off.

A Long and Winding Road to Revenues

There are still a number of obstacles to QuantumScape reaching commercial success. It has to validate its battery technology works beyond a small scale. And then it actually has to get its production up and running and start deliveries. From there, the OEMs have to use the batteries and see if they work better than other options in their vehicles.

This process will take at least a few years to play out, if everything goes well. Meanwhile, short-sellers have raised meaningful concerns about the company’s technology and management team. These allegations have not been adequately refuted, as the sorry chart of QS stock demonstrates.

I agree with my InvestorPlace colleague, Thomas Niel, who writes that potential QuantumScape investors will be able to get a better entry point at a lower stock price in future months.

QS Stock Verdict

I’ve long argued that QuantumScape doesn’t belong on a publicly traded market yet. There simply isn’t enough information for most investors to have a highly informed outlook on the company. The battery technology is profoundly speculative. If it works, QS stock will probably be a multi-bagger. If it doesn’t work, the stock would likely be close to worthless.

This is the sort of binary outcome that venture capital (VC) is good at managing. VC firms can build a portfolio of many such moonshot companies, knowing that, while most will fail, a few will pay off tenfold.

For retail investors, however, this sort of approach is risky. There is little to go on that confirms QuantumScape’s potential. You have to simply trust management and hold through at least 2023 before there will be tangible signs of progress. For most traders, there are much more rewarding ways to invest in the electric vehicle (EV) revolution.

On the date of publication, Ian Bezek did not have (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com Publishing Guidelines.

Ian Bezek has written more than 1,000 articles for InvestorPlace.com and Seeking Alpha. He also worked as a Junior Analyst for Kerrisdale Capital, a $300 million New York City-based hedge fund. You can reach him on Twitter at @irbezek.

More From InvestorPlace

The post QuantumScape is Still a Long Way From Showtime appeared first on InvestorPlace.

Continue Reading

Trending