Connect with us

Today’s News

Aurelius Initiates Exploration at Tangier and Forest Hill – Discovers Multiple High-Grade Intersections Including 302 g/t Au over 0.43 metres in Historical Drill Core

Toronto, Ontario–(Newsfile Corp. – October 26, 2021) – Aurelius Minerals Inc. (TSXV: AUL) (OTCQB: AURQF) (the "Company" or "Aurelius") is pleased to report…

Published

on

Toronto, Ontario–(Newsfile Corp. – October 26, 2021) – Aurelius Minerals Inc. (TSXV: AUL) (OTCQB: AURQF) (the “Company” or “Aurelius”) is pleased to report high-grade gold results from the Tangier and Forest Hill Projects in Nova Scotia, Canada. The Company recently completed a review of 10 historical, NQ sized drill core, that had been drilled from surface by diamond drill. Five of the holes are from the Tangier project and five holes are from the Forest Hill project. All holes were relogged and comprehensively sampled to identify overlooked gold mineralization. A total of 1,242 samples were taken with 1,220 samples from previously unsampled core and 22 samples from previously assayed core. Core from both projects was pulled from the secure Aurelius exploration facilities at the Tangier and Aureus East project sites.

The Tangier and Forest Hill projects are in the prolific Meguma gold district of Nova Scotia. The Tangier project is located within the historical gold mining community of the same name and is located approximately 65km east of Halifax. The Forest Hill project, also a past gold producer, is approximately 150km east of Halifax and 22km from the town of Sherbrooke (Figure 1).

Highlights from infill sampling programs:

Tangier Project

  • 4 of 5 holes sampled revealed significant gold mineralization
  • Hole TAN-19-01 (drilled in 2019)
    • Multiple new near surface high grade gold intersections
    • 302 grams per tonne gold, (“g/t Au”) over 0.43 metres (“m”), from 37.55m
    • 23.5 g/t Au over 0.31m, from 54.07m
    • 6.49 g/t Au over 0.28m, from 92.6m
  • Hole TAN-19-02 (drilled in 2019)
    • 32.9 g/t Au over 0.29m, from 20.35m
  • Hole TAN-14-02 (drilled in 2014)
    • 4.66 g/t Au over 0.9m, from 88.0m
    • 9.77 g/t Au over 0.45m, from 89.0m
  • Hole TAN14-03 (drilled in 2014)
    • 14.7 g/t Au over 1.0m, from 36.4m

Forest Hill Project

  • 3 of 5 holes sampled revealed significant gold mineralization
  • Hole FH-18-02
    • 100 g/t Au over 0.3m, from 96.8m

Details for the infill sampling program are included in Tables 1-3 below.

CEO of Aurelius, Mark N.J. Ashcroft, P.Eng stated, “Our reconnaissance exploration work, at both Tangier and Forest Hill, involved significant research into historical data and assessment reports, culminating in a review and the relogging of drill core from both projects, which were located at our secure storage facilities. We are very pleased to again discover unreported gold mineralization, and significant new gold intersections, previously overlooked by the prior operators. As we discovered during our initial reconnaissance exploration of the Aureus East and West projects, the assets acquired in Nova Scotia continue to show significant potential and opportunity as we apply a different methodology in evaluating the projects.”

Our team has remained focused on adding value by finding gold where others have yet to look. We have explored beyond the standard approach and by pushing these conventional limits we have unlocked significant potential to increase our gold resources. Just a year into the programs, we are very well positioned for the next phases and to continue on our pathway of discovery,” stated Jeremy Niemi, Vice President, Exploration.

The Tangier Project

The Tangier property has had a very long history, with gold first identified in 1860. Several campaigns of mining and exploration have been conducted since then, however, little modern exploration and almost no exploration has occurred outside of the traditional gold veins.

The Aurelius infill sampling campaign at Tangier involved reviewing five of 216 holes drilled at the project to relog, photograph and identify potentially overlooked gold mineralization through rigorous sampling. The holes were selected from three key areas at the project, the western extension of the deposit, the Strawberry Hill gold zone and a hole drilled north of the deposit (Figure 2). Multiple new high-grade gold intervals were identified along the western extension of the Tangier deposit within the three holes selected in the area. Holes TAN-19-01, TAN-19-02 and T14-02 are along the margin of the deposit, which was last bulk-sampled in 1999 from now flooded underground openings. The deposit extends from surface to a depth of approximately 300m and is 500m along strike in east-west direction. It is made up of at least 18 of south-dipping and parallel gold in quartz veins hosted within slate (argillite) and meta-greywacke beds. Traditionally the focus of mining and exploration concentrated on the quartz veins and the often large nuggets of gold associated with the high-grades. The infill sampling identified gold in the surrounding wall rock to the veins and opens a new opportunity to expand the gold resource at the project, beyond extending the mineralization at depth and along strike.

Hole T14-02 was selected due to its proximity to the Strawberry Hill gold zone, which is on trend of the Tangier deposit and 750m away to the east. The area has multiple gold hits greater than 5 g/t Au from multiple parallel gold in quartz veins, similar to the Tangier deposit. T14-02 infill sampling revealed four new intervals of gold mineralization between 73.0m and 149.0m down the hole. In all cases the new mineralization was due to sampling of host sediments adjacent to gold veins (Figure 3).

Hole TAN-14-06 did not reveal new gold mineralization, and the original target was north of the deposit and this hole may not have been optimally oriented or positioned. There are historical abandoned mine openings reported in the vicinity of the hole, which is encouraging for gold potential in the area.

Overall, the Company is encouraged by the high rate of success from the limited reconnaissance sampling program and is considering an expanded program to further identify areas of opportunity for gold resource growth. The Tangier gold exploration program is focused on growing the inferred mineral resource reported in the “Technical Report on the Tangier Gold Property” dated June 1, 2020, prepared by Greg Mosher, P.Geo, MSc, applied, of Global Mineral Resource Services and filed under the Company’s profile at SEDAR. The Tangier Gold Property technical report is also available on the Company’s website.

The Tangier project Mineral Resource currently includes 493,000 tonnes at a grade of 5.9 g/t Au which includes 93,000 ounces in the Inferred Mineral category (see Table 4). The Mineral Resource is limited to a depth of 300m and a strike length of approximately 500m, however gold mineralization in drilling has been confirmed over 1,500m along strike and very limited drilling has occurred below the deposit. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources estimated will be converted into Mineral Reserves. Inferred Mineral Resources are based on limited drilling which suggests the greatest uncertainty for a resource estimate and that geological continuity is only implied. Additional drilling will be required to verify geological and mineralization continuity and it is reasonable that most of the Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources

The Forest Hill Project

Infill sampling at Forest Hill reviewed 5 of 379 holes drilled at the project to relog, photograph and identify potentially overlooked gold mineralization through rigorous sampling. Multiple zones were identified with 3 of the 5 holes intersecting new gold mineralization. Most significant was the zone in hole FH-18-02 where a narrow bedding parallel vein, with visible gold, was overlooked. This sample graded 100 g/t Au and extended 0.3m from 96.8m to 97.1m depth.

Forest Hill was also mined and explored in the past via underground openings which are now capped and flooded. The site was rehabilitated in 1998.

The limited reconnaissance sampling program is very encouraging and is considering an expanded program to further identify areas of opportunity for gold resource growth. The Forest Hill gold exploration program is focused on growing the Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource reported in the “Technical Report on the Forest Hill Gold Property” dated June 1, 2020, prepared by Greg Mosher, P.Geo, MSc, applied, of Global Mineral Resource Services and filed under the Company’s profile at SEDAR. The Forest Hill Gold Property technical report is also available on the Company’s website.

The Mineral Resource at Forest Hill currently includes Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources. There are 322,000 tonnes at a grade of 7.1 g/t Au which includes 73,000 ounces in the indicated category as well as 905,000 tonnes at a grade of 7.1 g/t Au including 208,000 ounces in the inferred category (see Table 5). The Mineral Resource is limited to a depth of 300m and a strike length of approximately 2,300m and remains open at depth and along strike. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources estimated will be converted into Mineral Reserves. Inferred Mineral Resources are based on limited drilling which suggests the greatest uncertainty for a resource estimate and that geological continuity is only implied. Additional drilling will be required to verify geological and mineralization continuity and it is reasonable that most of the Inferred Mineral Resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources.

Figure 1: Project location map for Aurelius projects and adjacent gold projects (other companies)

To view an enhanced version of Figure 1, please visit:
https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/7140/100842_667f4b19c45acb74_002full.jpg

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://www.nxtmine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/2453b8b1c5bbbb9deb35f24d9ad5289e.jpg

Figure 2: Tangier plan map showing locations of holes selected for infill sampling

To view an enhanced version of Figure 2, please visit:
https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/7140/100842_667f4b19c45acb74_003full.jpg

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://www.nxtmine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/3def6b139b34eaa042cb98c070de9b78.jpg

Figure 3: Tangier longitudinal section showing location of infill holes with existing mineral resource

To view an enhanced version of Figure 3, please visit:
https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/7140/100842_667f4b19c45acb74_004full.jpg

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://www.nxtmine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/634a5757e5c960ce22883fc0e5aa913e.jpg

Figure 4: Forest Hill plan map showing locations of holes selected for infill sampling

To view an enhanced version of Figure 4, please visit:
https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/7140/100842_667f4b19c45acb74_005full.jpg

Cannot view this image? Visit: https://www.nxtmine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/6327fd4393137a3f553b011b6c54cec5.jpg

Figure 5: Forest Hill longitudinal section showing location of infill holes with existing mineral resource

To view an enhanced version of Figure 5, please visit:
https://orders.newsfilecorp.com/files/7140/100842_667f4b19c45acb74_006full.jpg

The Aurelius exploration approach involves stepping back and taking a wider view of opportunities for new gold mineralization and part of that is considering potentially overlooked gold in existing drilling. In recent years, exploration for gold in the Meguma district has expanded from the traditional high-grade gold in quartz veins and into the wall rock surrounding the veins. This approach has proven successful at identifying overlooked gold mineralization at all four of the projects in the Meguma district. In August, September and October 2020, the Company released results from assays of previously unsampled core at Aureus West and Aureus East as highlighted below.

Previously Reported Infill Sampling Results from Aureus East and West

Table 1. Gold intervals from 2021 infill sampling of historical holes at Tangier and Forest Hill

Project Drillhole From (m) To (m) Width (m) Au (g/t)
Tangier TAN-19-01 37.35 37.78 0.43 302
TAN-19-01 54.07 54.38 0.31 23.5
TAN-19-01 92.6 92.88 0.28 6.49
TAN-19-02 20.35 20.64 0.29 32.9
T14-02 73 74 1 1.73
T14-02 88 88.9 0.9 4.66
T14-02 89 89.45 0.45 9.77
T14-02 148 149 1 1.14
TAN14-03 36.4 37.4 1 14.7
TAN14-03 65 65.6 0.6 1.71
TAN14-03 65.6 65.9 0.3 3.07
TAN14-03 65.9 66.25 0.35 3.63
TAN14-06 No significant results
 
Forest Hill FH-18-01 156.7 157.1 0.4 3.9
FH-18-02 14.4 14.7 0.3 2.07
FH-18-02 24.2 24.5 0.3 1.47
FH-18-02 96.8 97.1 0.3 100
FH04-25 61 62 1 3.32
FH-15-83 No significant results
FH-03-08 No significant results

 

Gold grades are not capped, and due to folded geometry of veins, the intervals may not reflect actual width.

Table 2. Hole location, final depth and orientation for reported holes

Project Drillhole Easting Northing Azimuth Dip Length (m) Year Drilled
Tangier T14-02 525,037 4,961,839 320 -45 212 2014
TAN14-03 523,880 4,961,390 330 -45 128 2014
TAN14-06 523,575 4,961,560 155 -45 120 2014
TAN-19-01 523,880 4,961,390 317 -45 131 2019
TAN-19-02 523,880 4,961,390 317 -60 203 2019
Forest Hill FH-18-02 597,643 5,018,074 173 -65 110 2018
FH-18-01 597,643 5,018,074 173 -50 200 2018
FH-15-83 598,471 5,017,931 176 -45 186 2015
FH04-25 597,305 5,017,861 180 -45 150 2004
FH03-08 597,311 5,018,038 180 -48 250 2003

 

Table 3. Summary details for 2021 infill sampling for Tangier and Forest Hill

Infill Program Summary Tangier Forest Hill
Number of Holes 5 5
Metres of Infill Samples 519.99 464.34
Metres of Resamples 8.95 1.4
Total Number of Metres 528.94 465.74
Number of Resamples 18 4
Number of Infill Samples 643 577
Total Number of Core Samples 661 581
Total QAQC Samples Sent 47 42

 

Table 4. Mineral resources for Tangier property

CLASS TONNES AU G/T CAPPED CAPPED OUNCES AU UNCAPPED
AU G/T
OZ UNCAPPED AU
Inferred 493,000 5.9 93,000 9.9 163,000

 

  1. A cutoff of 2 g/t gold was used.
  2. Both capped (40 g/t) and uncapped grades are shown above.
  3. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resources will be converted to mineral reserves.
  4. Inferred Mineral Resources are based on limited drilling which suggests the greatest uncertainty for a resource estimate and that geological continuity is only implied. Additional drilling will be required to verify geological and mineralization continuity and it is reasonable that most of the inferred resources could be upgraded to indicated resources.
  5. Quantity and grades are estimates and are rounded to reflect the fact that the resource estimate is an approximation.
  6. The Mineral Resource estimate was prepared by G. Mosher, P.Geo, M.Sc. and is effective June 1, 2020.

Table 5. Mineral resources for Forest Hill property

CLASS TONNES AU G/T CAPPED CAPPED OUNCES AU UNCAPPED
AU G/T
OZ UNCAPPED AU
Indicated 322,000 7.1 73,000 11.0 114,000
Inferred 905,000 7.1 208,000 10.6 308,000

 

  1. A cutoff of 2 g/t gold was used.
  2. Both capped (110 g/t) and uncapped grades are shown above.
  3. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resources will be converted to mineral reserves.
  4. Inferred Mineral Resources are based on limited drilling which suggests the greatest uncertainty for a resource estimate and that geological continuity is only implied. Additional drilling will be required to verify geological and mineralization continuity and it is reasonable that most of the inferred resources could be upgraded to indicated resources.
  5. Quantity and grades are estimates and are rounded to reflect the fact that the resource estimate is an approximation.
  6. The Mineral Resource estimate was prepared by G. Mosher, P.Geo, M.Sc. and is effective June 1, 2020.

COVID-19 Precautions

Aurelius has developed and implemented compliant precautions and procedures that are in line with guidelines for the Province of Nova Scotia. Protocols were put in place to ensure the safety of our employees and contractors, thereby reducing the potential for community contact and spreading of the virus.

Qualified Person and Analytical Procedures

Mr. Jeremy Niemi, P.Geo. and Vice President, Exploration of Aurelius and the Company’s Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101, has reviewed and approved the technical information in this release.

Individual drill core samples are labeled, placed in plastic sample bags and sealed. Groups of samples are then placed into durable rice bags and then shipped by courier for analyses to ALS Geochemistry, Moncton, New Brunswick. Sample preparation occurs at ALS in Moncton where samples are weighed, dried, crushing one kilogram to 70 percent less than two millimeters and then pulverized to create a one-kilogram sample with 85 percent less than seventy-five microns. Potential high-grade gold samples are sent for metallic screen fire assay and remaining material is assayed for 50-gram fire assay and samples grading more than 100 parts per million have a gravimetric finish performed. When visible gold is encountered the Company samples both halves of the core. The remaining coarse reject portions of the samples remain in storage if further work or verification is needed. The Company inserted control samples (accredited gold standards, blanks and duplicates) at least every 20 samples and monitors the control samples inserted by ALS.

About Aurelius

Aurelius is a well-positioned gold exploration company focused on advancing its recently acquired and renamed Aureus Gold Properties, including Aureus East and West, the Tangier Gold Project and the Forest Hill Gold Project located in Nova Scotia and described in detail in the Company’s press release of November 18, 2019.

Aurelius is also focused on advancing two district-scale gold projects in the Abitibi Greenstone Belt in Ontario, Canada, one of the world’s most prolific mining districts; the 968-hectare Mikwam Property, in the Burntbush area on the Casa Berardi trend and the 12,425-hectare Lipton Property, on the Lower Detour Trend.

The Company has a management team with experience in all facets of the mineral exploration and mining industry who will be considering additional acquisitions of advanced staged opportunities in Nova Scotia, the Abitibi and other proven mining districts.

On Behalf of the Board
AURELIUS MINERALS INC.

For further information please contact:

Aurelius Minerals Inc.
Mark N.J. Ashcroft, P.Eng., President and CEO
[email protected]
Tel.: (416) 304-9095
www.aureliusminerals.com

Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This news release contains “forward-looking information” under the provisions of applicable Canadian securities legislation, concerning the business, operations and financial performance and condition of Aurelius. All statements in this press release, other than statements of historical fact, are “forward-looking information” with respect to Aurelius within the meaning of applicable securities laws, including statements with respect to the Company’s planned drilling and exploration activities, the anticipated benefits of the Acquisition and the development of the Aureus Gold Properties, the future price of gold, the estimation of Mineral Resources, the realization of Mineral Resource estimates, success of exploration activities, permitting time lines, currency exchange rate fluctuations, requirements for additional capital, government regulation of mining operations, environmental risks, unanticipated reclamation expenses, title disputes or claims and limitations on insurance coverage. Generally, this forward-looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects” , “is expected”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates” , “believes”, or variations or comparable language of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “should”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation thereof. Forward-looking information is necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, if untrue, could cause the actual results, performances or achievements of Aurelius to be materially different from future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by such statements. Such statements and information are based on numerous assumptions regarding present and future business strategies and the environment in which Aurelius will operate in the future, including the price of gold, anticipated costs and ability to achieve goals.

Certain important factors that could cause actual results, performances or achievements to differ materially from those in the forward-looking information include, among others, gold price volatility, mining operational and development risks, litigation risks, regulatory restrictions (including environmental regulatory restrictions and liability), changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls or regulations and/or change in the administration of laws, policies and practices, expropriation or nationalization of property and political or economic developments in Canada, delays, suspension and technical challenges associated with projects, higher prices for fuel, steel, power, labour and other consumables, currency fluctuations, the speculative nature of gold exploration, the global economic climate, dilution, share price volatility, competition, loss of key employees, additional funding requirements and defective title to mineral claims or property. Although Aurelius believes its expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions and has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Mineral Resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no certainty that all or any part of the Mineral Resources will be converted to Mineral Reserves. Inferred Mineral Resources are based on limited drilling which suggests the greatest uncertainty for a resource estimate and that geological continuity is only implied. Additional drilling will be required to verify geological and mineralization continuity and it is reasonable that most of the Inferred Mineral resources could be upgraded to Indicated Mineral Resources.

The Company provides forward-looking information for the purpose of conveying information about current expectations and plans relating to the future and readers are cautioned that such statements may not be appropriate for other purposes. By its nature, this information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of Aurelius to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements, including but not limited to: risks related to difficulties in executing exploration programs at the Mikwam, Lipton and Aureus Gold Properties on the Company’s proposed schedules and within its cost and scheduling estimates, whether due to weather conditions, availability or interruption of power supply, mechanical equipment performance problems, natural disasters or pandemics in the areas where it operates, the integration of acquisition; risks related to current global financial conditions including market reaction to the coronavirus outbreak; competition within the industry; actual results of current exploration activities; environmental risks; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; future price of gold; failure of plant, equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; mine development and operating risks; accidents, labour disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays in obtaining approvals or financing; risks related to indebtedness and the service of such indebtedness, as well as those factors, risks and uncertainties identified and reported in Aurelius’ public filings under Aurelius’ SEDAR profile at www.sedar.com. Although Aurelius has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Forward-looking statements are made as of the date hereof and, accordingly, are subject to change after such date. Aurelius disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise unless required by law.

To view the source version of this press release, please visit https://www.newsfilecorp.com/release/100842







Author: Author

Today’s News

Hemlo Identifies Targets Within 3 km of the Proposed Open Pit Pd-Cu Operation of Generation Mining

TORONTO, Dec. 09, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Hemlo Explorers Inc. (the “Company”) (TSXV: HMLO) is pleased to announce that it has identified sulphide…

TORONTO, Dec. 09, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Hemlo Explorers Inc. (the “Company”) (TSXV: HMLO) is pleased to announce that it has identified sulphide targets on the Company’s Pic Project approximately 3 kms east of Generation Mining’s Marathon Palladium-Copper (“Pd-Cu”) proposed open pit operation (“Marathon Deposit”) near Marathon, Ontario (Figure 1).

“We are very excited to have begun work on this prospective area near Generation’s project. The sulphide mineralization identified in a previous drill hole is encouraging as we move this project forward”, said Brian Howlett, President and CEO of the Company.

The Marathon Deposit is hosted in a late intrusive phase gabbro along the northern and eastern margin of the Coldwell Complex which intrudes the older Archean Schreiber-Hemlo greenstone belt. The Company’s recent prospecting and property evaluation at Pic has identified surface gabbro intrusions that are similar to the intrusions on Generation Mining’s property and that are enriched with Pd-Cu at the Marathon Deposit. The Company’s target development is guided by the magma conduit deposit model which is favoured to explain sulphide mineralization and other economic mineral enrichment at Marathon. Some of the key highlights for target development are as follows:

Highlights:

  • Radial, concentric and intersecting fault development, as a consequence of Coldwell Complex magma uplift and caldera collapse, served as conduits for the Pd-Cu bearing gabbroic magmas at the Marathon Deposit (Figure 2). These structures extend into the Archean country rocks on Hemlo Explorer’s claims, where north-south trending gabbro dykes have been observed from historic mapping.
  • 1983 ground magnetic and IP surveys show a linear north-south trend extending due south of a 2008 VTEM survey chargeability anomaly (Figure 3). The VTEM anomaly sits on an interpreted radial fault and is possibly an indication of sulphide mineralization.
  • Field mapping in 1983 and 1984 identify silicified and sericitized rhyolite breccia zones with a corresponding 1983 IP anomaly.
  • Sulphide mineralization returned from a 1985 historic drillhole BMN-03 approximately one kilometre east of the same 2008 VTEM anomaly as above and could be indicative of magma-country rock mixing and sulphide stripping with 10 intervals of variable pyrite, minor pyrrhotite and sphalerite mineralization in silica-sericite altered felspar porphyry breccia, plus multiple biotite lamprophyre dykes. Significant sulphide mineralization ranged from 15-100% and up to core interval lengths of 24 metres.
  • As noted on vertical section 5404700 N of the Generation Mining press release dated August 17, 2021 (www.sedar.com), sulphide stripping and deposition of the Coldwell Complex Eastern gabbro at the Marathon project occurred with mixing of the Archean basement rock with mineralization extending well into the footwall Archean basement rocks.

The target area’s structural, geophysical and aspects of the geological setting resembles that of the Generation Mining’s Marathon deposit located W-NW of Hemlo Explorer’s claims. Brian Howlett, CEO of Hemlo Explorers, commented “We are pleased to have identified some significant targets for active exploration. We are currently considering airborne VTEM and high-resolution magnetic surveys, the acquisition of high-definition LIDAR, drilling of the VTEM and magnetic high anomalies and trends. The compilation of historical data is well advanced and integral to the evolving geological interpretation.”

Figure #1 – Project Location Map
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7bf0c6cf-2e86-4598-9175-f955f49bc492

Figure #2: Regional Geology with Interpreted Concentric and Radial Faulting
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/b21ff814-b005-4529-93a2-7d77cf676e49

Figure #3: Regional Magnetics and Historic Exploration
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/6d1ea900-fef3-47b4-a5a8-9c22b46490fa

Technical Information

Mr. Adrian Bray, P.Geo., Exploration Manager for the Company, is the “Qualified Person” as defined by National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, responsible for the accuracy of technical information contained in this news release.

About Hemlo Explorers Inc.

Hemlo Explorers is a Canadian-based mineral exploration company with a portfolio of properties in Ontario and Nunavut. We are focused on generating shareholder value through the advancement of our main Hemlo area projects, including the Pic Project, North Limb, and Hemlo West.

For more information please contact:

Brian Howlett, President & CEO
Hemlo Explorers Inc.
[email protected]
(647) 227-3035

http://www.hemloexplorers.ca

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain information set forth in this news release may contain forward-looking statements that involve substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, exploration results, potential mineralization, statements relating to mineral resources, and the Company’s plans with respect to the exploration and development of its properties. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the control of Hemlo Explorers Inc., including, but not limited to, the impact of general economic conditions, industry conditions, volatility of commodity prices, risks associated with the uncertainty of exploration results and estimates, currency fluctuations, dependency upon regulatory approvals, the uncertainty of obtaining additional financing, exploration risk and Covid-19 pandemic related orders. Readers are cautioned that the assumptions used in the preparation of such information, although considered reasonable at the time of preparation, may prove to be imprecise and, as such, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking statements.









Author: Author

Continue Reading

Today’s News

UEX Announces Fall Drill Program Results from Christie Lake

 

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan – TheNewswire – December 9, 2021 – UEX Corporation (TSX:UEX) (“UEX” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce the…

[nxtlink id=

 

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan – TheNewswire – December 9, 2021 – UEX Corporation (TSX:UEX) (“UEX” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce the results of its fall 2021 exploration drilling program at the Christie Lake Project, located in the Athabasca Basin of northern Saskatchewan (see Figure 1).

The fall program totaled 1,573 m of drilling in three completed holes, including two new drill holes and an off-cut from an existing drill hole (Figure 1).  Less drilling was completed than originally anticipated due to a later than expected program start due to contractor availability.  Poor ground conditions resulted in two holes being abandoned.

The drilling program tested targets in two areas, both located north-east of the Ōrora Deposit along the main Yalowega Trend.  The first target area evaluated the unconformity near drill hole CB-124 for a possible northeast extension of the Ōrora Deposit.  The second target area tested the unconformity adjacent to encouraging anomalous geochemistry and strong hydrothermal clay alteration encountered during the 2020 drill program, approximately 1,000 m along strike of the Ōrora Deposit.

Drill hole CB-124-1 was an off-cut drill hole from pilot hole CB-124 and tested the unconformity approximately 20 m southeast of CB-124 for a possible extension of the Ōrora Deposit. The pilot hole showed substantial geochemical enrichment of uranium, averaging more than 10 ppm U in the lower 132.5 m of the sandstone column.  Intense hydrothermal alteration of the basement rocks was observed just below the unconformity in the pilot hole.

The off-cut drill hole CB-124-1 intersected the Yalowega Trend Fault in the basement rocks below the unconformity.  Uranium geochemical enrichment of the basement was encountered that included 181 ppm U from 496.6 to 497.0 m and 172 ppm U from 508.2 to 508.4 metres.  The uranium enrichment was hosted within a much wider interval of visible hydrothermal alteration that penetrated more than 60 m into the basement below the unconformity. The UEX team believes that the combination of enhanced uranium geochemical enrichment, permissive fault structures and widespread basement hydrothermal alteration suggest that there is good potential for uranium mineralization to occur in the basement rocks below and extending from the north end of the Ōrora Deposit.  Widely spaced holes in the vicinity of the north end of the Ōrora Deposit drilled by the previous operator contain basement-hosted uranium mineralization that has yet to be followed up, that will be tested in future exploration programs.

Drill hole CB-153A tested the potential for unconformity-hosted uranium mineralization on L79N, in the Ōrora North Resistivity anomaly area, approximately 40 m southwest of 2020 drill hole CB-151.  Hole CB-153A tested the unconformity expression of the extensive faulting, alteration, and geochemical anomalism encountered in the basal sandstone of CB-151 (see UEX news release October 1, 2020). Hole CB-153A intersected anomalous uranium geochemistry averaging 1.9 ppm U within in the basal 29.4 m of the sandstone.

Hole CB-154A was drilled 110 m southwest along strike of the Yalowega Trend from CB-153A.  CB-154A tested the unconformity for the intersection of the Yalowega Trend Fault with the east-west striking fault encountered within the sandstone columns of both CB-151 and CB-150.  CB-154A returned two unusual and highly anomalous boron geochemical anomalies within the sandstone column, one that averaged 620 ppm boron over 70 m between 100 m and 170m above the unconformity and the second that exceeded 645 ppm boron over the basal 45.8 m of sandstone.  The presence of such strong sandstone-hosted boron anomalies and the intersection of fault structures indicate that there is good potential for uranium mineralization to occur in the basement rocks within the Yalowega Trend north-east and along strike from the Ōrora Deposit, that will be tested in future exploration programs.

The anomalous uranium geochemistry in the basement of CB124-1 shows a strong indication of the uranium potential in the immediate vicinity of the Ōrora Deposit. The technical team continues to evaluate the structural controls for the mineralization along the Yalowega Trend and this degree of anomalism is tremendously exciting for future work UEX is planning. The addition of two solid vectors that support further exploration work in this area shows the increasing potential of the Yalowega Trend.

  • Chris Hamel Vice President, Exploration 

UEX is currently in the process of planning and preparing for the 2022 exploration program at Christie Lake that will commence in the new year.  The Christie Lake JV partners are proposing work along the Yalowega Trend at depth in the Paul Bay through Ōrora Deposits area to test for basement-hosted uranium deposits based upon the UEX team’s new structural interpretation of the area, as well as new drilling along the A and B Trends of the P2 Corridor extending onto the project from the adjacent McArthur River Mine Property.  The B Trend has only seen limited exploration drilling, whereas the A Trend has very limited drilling and is essentially untested.

About the Christie Lake Project

UEX currently holds a 82.775% combined direct and indirect interest in the Christie Lake Project which the Company is in joint venture with JCU (Canada) Exploration Company, Limited. The Project is located approximately 9 km northeast and along strike of Cameco’s McArthur River Mine, the world’s largest uranium producer. The P2 Fault, the controlling structure for all of the McArthur River deposits, continues to the northeast beyond the mine and onto the Christie Lake Project. UEX believes that through a series of en-echelon steps the northeast strike extension of the P2 Fault not only crosses the Project but also controls the three known uranium deposits on Christie Lake: the Ōrora, Paul Bay and Ken Pen Deposits.

The Christie Lake Project is currently estimated to contain 588,000 tonnes grading 1.57% U3O8, which equates to 20.35 million pounds of U3O8 using a cut-off grade of 0.2% U3O8 and as documented in the “Technical Report for the Christie Lake Uranium Project, Saskatchewan, Canada” which was filed on February 1, 2019 and has an effective date of December 13, 2018. The Technical Report is available on the Company’s website at www.uexcorp.com and on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.

Qualified Persons and Data Acquisition

The technical information in this news release has been reviewed and approved by Roger Lemaitre, P.Eng., P.Geo., UEX’s President and CEO and Chris Hamel, P.Geo, UEX’s Vice President, Exploration, and Nathan Barsi, P.Geo., UEX’s District Geologist, who are each considered to be a Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument 43-101.

   

About UEX

 

UEX is a Canadian uranium and cobalt exploration and development company involved in an exceptional portfolio of uranium projects.

UEX’s directly-owned portfolio of projects is located in the eastern, western and northern perimeters of the Athabasca Basin, the world’s richest uranium belt which in 2020 accounted for approximately 8.1% of the global primary uranium production. In addition to advancing its uranium development projects through its ownership interest in JCU, UEX is currently advancing several other uranium deposits in the Athabasca Basin which include the Paul Bay, Ken Pen and Ōrora deposits at the Christie Lake Project , the Kianna, Anne, Colette and 58B deposits at its currently 49.1%-owned Shea Creek Project, the Horseshoe and Raven deposits located on its 100%-owned Horseshoe-Raven Development Project and the West Bear Uranium Deposit located at its 100%-owned West Bear Project.

UEX is also 50:50 co-owner of JCU (Canada) Exploration Company, Limited with Denison Mines Corp. JCU’s portfolio of projects includes interests in some of Canada’s key future uranium development projects, notably a 30.099% interest in Cameco’s Millennium Uranium Development Project, a 10% interest in Denison’s Wheeler River Project, and a 33.8123% interest in Orano Canada’s Kiggavik Project, located in the Thelon Basin in Nunavut, as well as minority interests in nine other grassroots uranium projects in the Athabasca Basin.

UEX is also leading the discovery of cobalt in Canada, with three cobalt-nickel exploration projects located in the Athabasca Basin of northern Saskatchewan, including the only primary cobalt deposit in Canada. The 100% owned West Bear Project hosts the West Bear Cobalt-Nickel Deposit, the newly discovered Michael Lake Co-Ni Zone, and the West Bear Uranium Deposit. UEX also owns 100% of two early-stage cobalt exploration projects, the Axis Lake and Key West Projects.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT

 

Roger Lemaitre

President & CEO

(306) 979-3849

 

Forward-Looking Information

 

This news release contains statements that constitute “forward-looking information” for the purposes of Canadian securities laws. Such statements are based on UEX’s current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections. Such forward-looking information includes statements regarding UEX’s drill hole results, uranium, cobalt and nickel prices, outlook for our future operations, plans and timing for exploration activities, and other expectations, intentions and plans that are not historical fact. Such forward-looking information is based on certain factors and assumptions and is subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from UEX’s expectations include uncertainties relating to the, interpretation of drill results and geology, assay confirmation, additional drilling results, continuity and grade of deposits, fluctuations in uranium, cobalt and nickel prices and currency exchange rates, changes in environmental and other laws affecting uranium, cobalt and nickel exploration and mining and other risks and uncertainties disclosed in UEX’s Annual Information Form and other filings with the applicable Canadian securities commissions on SEDAR. Many of these factors are beyond the control of UEX. Consequently, all forward-looking information contained in this news release is qualified by this cautionary statement and there can be no assurance that actual results or developments anticipated by UEX will be realized. For the reasons set forth above, investors should not place undue reliance on such forward-looking information. Except as required by applicable law, UEX disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 


Click Image To View Full Size

 

Figure 1

Copyright (c) 2021 TheNewswire – All rights reserved.












Author: Author

Continue Reading

Today’s News

Nevada Copper Provides Operational Activity Update

YERINGTON, Nev., Dec. 09, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Nevada Copper Corp. (TSX: NCU) (OTC: NEVDF) (FSE: ZYTA) (“Nevada Copper” or the “Company”)…

YERINGTON, Nev., Dec. 09, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Nevada Copper Corp. (TSX: NCU) (OTC: NEVDF) (FSE: ZYTA) (“Nevada Copper” or the “Company”) today provided an operations update and overview of the H2 2021 milestones achieved at its underground mine at the Company’s Pumpkin Hollow Project (the “Underground Mine”).

The Company has experienced a significant reset and demonstrated significant operational and corporate improvements in H2 2021. These milestones provide a foundation for an accelerating pace of operational ramp-up.

“I am very pleased with the progress the Company has made in H2 of this year,” stated Randy Buffington, President and Chief Executive Officer. “Our mining rates, a key metric for ramp-up production advancement, have been increasing month over month. We are now seeing the efficiencies generated from the advanced management systems implemented in Q3 of this year. The building blocks are in place for increased mining rates and production as we move into H1 of next year.”

Operations

  • Equipment availabilities materially improved: 14% improvement from 65% to 74% in total fleet availability since the beginning of Q4, 2021. Additional equipment expected to be added in Q4, 2021.
  • Contractor performance improved: Productivity increased by 31% from 1.75 to 2.29ft per person shift between October and November resulting in substantial improvement in operating efficiency as well as cost reductions.
  • Increased mining development rates: Sequential monthly increases in development rates, a key leading indicator of production ramp-up, delivered since management changes in August 2021. Rates achieved in December are currently 50% higher than August. Commissioning of additional bolters planned to deliver a further 50% increase in development rates in the coming weeks.
  • Consistent mill performance: Milling operations have performed well throughout 2021, with batch processing reaching 4700tpd, recoveries over 90% and concentrate quality performing in-line with design specifications.
  • Dike crossing completion: First crossing of the water bearing dike was completed in August 2021, and the second crossing is anticipated to occur later this year. No further crossings are required during the ramp up to 3ktpd expected in H1, 2022.
  • Ventilation infrastructure in place: All underground ventilation infrastructure was completed in H1 2021. Final addition of surface ventilation fans remains on schedule, with commissioning planned to be completed in January, 2022, with ventilation no longer expected to be a constraint to production rates thereafter.

Corporate

  • Transformational financing completed:
    • Closed C$125m public equity offering in November 2021, with a significant portion of the funds provided by select mining sector corporates. This was further complemented by broad participation from other new and existing institutional investors.
    • The upsized financing provides additional liquidity to fund exploration and expansion studies at the Company’s open pit project (the “Open Pit Project”) in addition to the ramp-up of Underground Mine.
  • Significantly enhanced balance sheet flexibility:
    • Long term debt reduced by approximately 30% during Q4, 2021.
    • First debt repayment under the Company’s senior credit facility with KfW-IPEX Bank deferred by 2 years to July 2024.
  • Hiring of key management positions:
    • Joining as Chief Executive Officer on October 6, 2021, Randy Buffington brings substantial operational and development experience in both underground and open pit mines in Nevada and internationally.
    • 8 key operational management positions added in H2 2021, resulting in operational improvement and enhanced planning and execution systems.
  • Development
    • Developed program for Open Pit Project resource extension and feasibility study: The budget and execution plan have been defined and the Company expects that drilling to support the updated open pit feasibility study will commence in Q2 2022, potentially sooner depending on drill rig availability.
    • Open Pit Project Decarbonization Program Advanced:
      • Solar power studies were completed in 2021, which show:
        • Pumpkin Hollow benefits from ample sun and land to support a large solar project with the capacity to meet a significant portion of the Open Pit Project’s power requirements;
        • The solar potential at the site is up to 200MW;
        • The already low grid power costs in Nevada could be further reduced through an on-site solar plant; and
        • A third-party solar project provides an option to remove upfront power infrastructure costs from the Open Pit Project.
      • Electric fleet study for mobile mining equipment fleet electrification at the Open Pit Project was completed by US-based energy and sustainability consultant Sprout Energy, which concluded:
        • Scope 1 carbon emissions over the life of mine could be reduced by approximately 10% of total estimated emissions; and
        • Fuel and maintenance costs could be reduced by up to approximately US$200m over the life of mine.
  • Exploration
    • Undertook further property reconnaissance on the Copper Ridge Area, which is located to the northeast of the Open Pit.
    • Defined target exploration plan: Initiated further refinement and interpretation of the newer geophysics in key areas such as Tedeboy, Tedeboy porphyry and Copper Ridge.
    • Initial grab sampling and mapping of these areas have resulted in areas with high grade copper samples. Surface mapping and sampling are planned for Q1 of 2022, supporting the commencement of drilling in Q2 2022.

Qualified Persons
The technical information and data in this news release was reviewed by Greg French, C.P.G., VP Head of Exploration of Nevada Copper, and Neil Schunke, P.Eng., a consultant to Nevada Copper, who are non-independent Qualified Persons within the meaning of NI 43-101.

About Nevada Copper
Nevada Copper (TSX: NCU) is a copper producer and owner of the Pumpkin Hollow copper project. Located in Nevada, USA, Pumpkin Hollow has substantial reserves and resources including copper, gold and silver. Its two fully permitted projects include the high-grade Underground Mine and processing facility, which is now in the production stage, and a large-scale Open Pit Project, which is advancing towards feasibility status.

NEVADA COPPER CORP.
www.nevadacopper.com

Randy Buffington, President and CEO

For further information contact:
Rich Matthews, Investor Relations
Integrous Communications
[email protected]
+1 604 757 7179

Cautionary Language

This news release includes certain statements and information that constitute forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. All statements in this news release, other than statements of historical facts are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements and forward-looking information specifically include, but are not limited to, statements that relate to mine development, production and ramp-up objectives, exploration activities, equipment installation and the completion of a new feasibility study.

Forward-looking statements and information include statements regarding the expectations and beliefs of management. Often, but not always, forward-looking statements and forward-looking information can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects”, “potential”, “is expected”, “anticipated”, “is targeted”, “budget”, “scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, or “believes” or the negatives thereof or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved. Forward-looking statements or information should not be read as guarantees of future performance and results. They are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results and events to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information.

Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, those relating to: the ability of the Company to complete the ramp-up of the Underground Mine within the expected cost estimates and timeframe; requirements for additional capital and no assurance can be given regarding the availability thereof; the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the business and operations of the Company; the state of financial markets; history of losses; dilution; adverse events relating to milling operations, construction, development and ramp-up, including the ability of the Company to address underground development and process plant issues; ground conditions; cost overruns relating to development, construction and ramp-up of the Underground Mine; loss of material properties; interest rates increase; global economy; limited history of production; future metals price fluctuations; speculative nature of exploration activities; periodic interruptions to exploration, development and mining activities; environmental hazards and liability; industrial accidents; failure of processing and mining equipment to perform as expected; labor disputes; supply problems; uncertainty of production and cost estimates; the interpretation of drill results and the estimation of mineral resources and reserves; changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; possible variations in ore reserves, grade of mineralization or recovery rates from management’s expectations and the difference may be material; legal and regulatory proceedings and community actions; accidents; title matters; regulatory approvals and restrictions; increased costs and physical risks relating to climate change, including extreme weather events, and new or revised regulations relating to climate change; permitting and licensing; volatility of the market price of the Company’s securities; insurance; competition; hedging activities; currency fluctuations; loss of key employees; other risks of the mining industry as well as those risks discussed in the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis in respect of the year ended December 31, 2020 and in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Information Form dated March 18, 2021. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described in forward-looking statements or information. The forward-looking information or statements are stated as of the date hereof. Nevada Copper disclaims any intent or obligation to update forward-looking statements or information except as required by law. Readers are referred to the additional information regarding Nevada Copper’s business contained in Nevada Copper’s reports filed with the securities regulatory authorities in Canada. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual actions, events, or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that could cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. For more information on Nevada Copper and the risks and challenges of its business, investors should review Nevada Copper’s filings that are available at www.sedar.com.

Nevada Copper provides no assurance that forward-looking statements and information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements or information. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information.

 








Author: Author

Continue Reading

Trending